Summary

  • The reason for the absence of IPv5 is that it never existed, despite confusion on the part of some people, seemingly fueled by internet videos claiming to explain its disappearance.
  • The so-called ‘stream protocol’ was actually proposed to support voice communication via the internet, and it was this that was intended to be IPv5.
  • This protocol was not adopted, and voice communication via IP is now standardised under SIP; as such, the proposal was reincarnated to include support for video, but it also failed to attract support.
  • The number ‘five’ relates to the version number of the network protocol, and though IPv6 did eventually materialise, there is no tangible connection between it and the stream protocol proposal.
  • Overall, the video claiming to explain the disappearance of IPv5 is something of a red herring, as it gives the impression of answering a question that never needed asking.

By Al Williams

Original Article