Summary

  • The author prefers their phone’s default launcher to third-party options as it better integrates with the operating system for a consistent user experience, with no compatibility issues.
  • Default launchers are also more reliable and well supported than third-party launchers, as smartphone makers see them as a unique selling point and are therefore less likely to abandon them.
  • The author’s Google Pixel 6a runs on the Pixel Launcher, which the author credits for its simplicity and speed, whilst also allowing access to features like Google Discover and a universal search.
  • The downsides of third-party launchers include the risk of abandonment, acquisition, or compatibility issues, forcing the author to return to default launchers due to the time invested in customizing launchers.
  • The acquisition of Nova Launcher by Branch Metrics, and the subsequent lack of updates, supports the author’s views that default launchers are a better option.
  • The author concludes that, while simpler, default launchers offer a more seamless experience and long-term reliability and support.

By Alvin Wanjala

Original Article